To build the research and teaching capacities of the
1890 land-grant institutions and Tuskegee University through cooperative
programs with Federal and nonfederal entities.
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE:
Project Grants. Place Cursor Here for Definition
USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS:
For teaching grants, funds may be used in the following targeted areas: (1)
Curricula design and materials development; (2) faculty preparation and
enhancement for teaching; (3) instruction delivery systems; (4) scientific
instrumentation for teaching; (5) student experiential learning; and (6)
student recruitment and retention. For research grants, funds may be used to
address high- priority research initiatives in areas where there is a present
or anticipated need for increased capabilities and in which it is feasible for
applicants to develop programs recognized for their excellence. Research areas
include, but are not limited to: (1) Studies and experimentation in food and
agricultural sciences; (2) centralized research support systems; and (3)
technology delivery systems.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
Applicant Eligibility: The 1890 land-grant
institutions and Tuskegee University.
Beneficiary Eligibility: The 1890 land-grant
institutions and Tuskegee University, non-1890 academic institutions, private
industry, and the Department of Agriculture.
Credentials/Documentation: Each applicant must
provide assurances specified in the solicitation of applications and a
cooperator form from each USDA agency that has agreed to participate in the
undertaking.
Pre-application Coordination: All
proposals/solicitations are published in the Federal Register. This program is
excluded from coverage under E.O. 12372.
Application Procedure: Formal proposals should be
submitted to the Office of Extramural Programs, CSREES, as outlined in the
solicitation of applications. Application procedures are contained in the
program regulations and required forms are contained in the Grant Application
Kit. This program is subject to the regulatory provisions of USDA, 7 CFR Part
3015, et seq., and all successor regulations.
Award Procedure: Proposals are reviewed and
evaluated by CSREES staff members with the assistance and advice of peer
panels of qualified educators, scientists, administrators, and other
appropriate persons that are specialists in the fields covered by the
proposals. Proposals are supported in order of merit to the extent permitted
by available funds. Grant payments are made by the electronic transfer system.
Deadlines: All deadlines are announced in the
Federal Register. Deadline for submission of fiscal year 2002 proposals was
January 31, 2002.
Range of Approval/Disapproval Time: From 90 to
180 days.
Appeals: None.
Renewals: None.
ASSISTANCE CONSIDERATIONS:
Formula and Matching Requirements: None. However,
matching is strongly encouraged and is a point of consideration in the peer
evaluation process.
Length and Time Phasing of Assistance: Grants are
awarded for a 1 to 3 year period and may receive no-cost extensions of time as
appropriate up to maximum of 5 years.
POST ASSISTANCE REQUIREMENTS:
Reports: Annual progress reports. Quarterly
financial reports. Final progress and financial reports are due within 90 days
after project expiration.
Audits: In accordance with the provisions of OMB
Circular No. A- 133 (Revised, June 24, 1997), "Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations," nonfederal entities that
expend financial assistance of $300,000 or more in Federal awards will have a
single or a program-specific audit conducted for that year. Nonfederal
entities that expend less than $300,000 a year in Federal awards are exempt
from Federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular No.
A-133.
Records: Grantees are expected to maintain
separate records for each grant to ensure that funds are expended for
authorized purposes. Grant related records must be retained at least 3 years;
records must be retained beyond the 3-year period if litigation is pending or
audit findings have not been resolved.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Account Identification: 12-1500-0-1-352.
Obligations: (Grants) FY 01 $8,975,557; FY 02 est
$8,978,692; and FY 03 est $8,978,692.
Range and Average of Financial Assistance:
Teaching grants: $88,470 to $225,000. Average: $171,443. Research grants:
$107,574 to $349,793. Average: $242,524.
Example of accomplishments: At one university students are learning new ideas
and gaining more knowledge in the production of crops that are less labor
intense but have a high market value; another university is developing a
multi-media laboratory and upgrading equipment in the food service laboratory,
expanding student experiential learning opportunities and professional
development of faculty in order to equip students with the knowledge and
scientific, analytical, and professional skills to meet the needs of the job
market.
REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE:
7 CFR Part 3015, USDA Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations (implementing the
provisions of OMB Circular Nos. A-21 and A-110); 7 CFR Part 3017, Government
wide Debarment and Suspensions (Nonprocurement) and Government wide
Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants); 7 CFR Part 3018, Restrictions
on Lobbying; 7 CFR part 3019, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grant
sand Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Nonprofit Organizations. 7 CFR Part 3406, 1890 Institution Capacity Building
Grants Program, Administrative Provisions; 7 CFR 3407, Agency Procedures to
Implement the National Environment Policy Act of 1969; annual solicitation of
applications; and Grant Application Kit.
INFORMATION CONTACTS:
Regional or Local Office: None.
Headquarters Office: National Program Leader,
Higher Education Programs, Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Stop 2251; 1400
Independence Avenue, SW; Washington, DC 20250-2251. Telephone: (202) 720-2186.
Web Site Address: http://www.reeusda.gov
EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS:
Strengthening the Graduate Environmental Science Program; Development of a
Student Managed Mobile Nutrition Intervention Unit; Energy for the Productive
Caprine; and Controlling Ineffective Bradyrhizobium with Phages to Enhance
Nitrogen Fixation in Soybean.
CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS:
Proposals are evaluated using the following criteria: Intrinsic merit; overall
approach and cooperative linkages; originality; personnel; institutional
capacity building; budget and cost effectiveness; overall quality of proposal;
and matching support.